Blogs

The law is dynamic and constantly evolving – and so is Rothwell Figg. We are at the forefront of the legal developments that impact businesses and industries, and our blogs provide communications that are relevant to client goals and objectives across local, regional, national, and global markets.

PTAB Law Blog

  • The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently designated its decision in Cambridge v. Sfara (IPR2024-00952) as an informative decision.[1] This designation addresses an important issue in inter partes review (IPR) proceedings: inconsistent claim construction arguments between district court litigation and PTAB petitions. Claim Construction Inconsistency The PTAB’s holding centered on Petitioner’s proposed construction of... Continue Reading
  • The Federal Circuit’s holding in United Servs. Auto. Ass’n v. PNC Bank N.A., No. 2023-2171, 2025 WL 339662 (Fed. Cir. Jan. 30, 2025) reversed a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) decision finding no motivation to combine.  The opinion is nonprecedential, but the Federal Circuit’s analysis of the facts in light of recent precedent is... Continue Reading
  • On March 4, 2025, the Federal Circuit affirmed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board’s (“PTAB”) decision in Restem, LLC v. Jadi Cell, LLC, No. 23-2054, 2025 WL 679195, at *1 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 4, 2025), finding that the patent challenger failed to prove that the claims were unpatenable and offering two key takeaways. The Parties... Continue Reading

Biosimilars Law Bulletin

Privacy Zone

Where technology and intellectual property meet privacy
  • It is fairly standard language in privacy policies: “This privacy policy may be amended or updated from time to time, so please check back regularly for updates.”  It sends the message that the company can change its data practices and policies without ever notifying the end-user. It tells the end-user that the burden is on them... Continue Reading
  • On Oct. 30, President Joe Biden issued an executive order on safe, secure and trustworthy artificial intelligence.[1] The executive order provides a sprawling list of directives aimed at establishing standards for AI safety and security and protecting privacy. While the executive order acknowledges the executive branch’s lack of authority for any lawmaking or rulemaking, AI... Continue Reading
  • Following its many warnings of impending enforcement action against entities providing Artificial Intelligence (“AI”) products, the FTC has officially launched an investigation into OpenAI[1]. The FTC initiates its investigation on the heels of the Center for AI and Digital Policy’s July 10, 2023 supplement to its March 30, 2023 complaint, which requests that the FTC... Continue Reading

RF EMerge

A Resource for Innovators
  • As we previously discussed, beginning in 2022, a series of patent infringement lawsuits were filed against Moderna and collaborators Pfizer+BioNTech seeking damages based on their respective sales of the Spikevax® and Comirnaty® COVID-19 vaccines. Key suits were filed by third party mRNA and lipid pioneers that, while not having any mRNA-based products on the market themselves,... Continue Reading
  • In 1910, German scientist Paul Ehrlich introduced a groundbreaking concept to the world: chemical compounds could be engineered to interact with unique receptors on disease-causing cells while avoiding interaction with healthy cells. Over a century later, Antibody Drug Conjugates (ADCs) – which are a species of Ehrlich’s “magic bullet” concept – have been developed by... Continue Reading
  • Although the Corporate Transparency Act (the “CTA”) is no longer halted by nationwide preliminary injunctions, U.S. companies and their beneficial owners are not required to report beneficial ownership information pursuant to the CTA. FinCEN Issues Interim Final Rule In the most recent CTA update from March 21, 2025, the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (“FinCEN”) issued... Continue Reading

Trademark Opposition Lawyer

Insight & commentary on TTAB Proceedings
  • The Hook ’em Horns of the University of Texas earned a big win in a recent trademark opposition proceeding.  This is an interesting sports trademark case. The case, the Board of Regents of the University of Texas v. Kendall A. Beaver, was brought by UT against the owner of the following trademark application: The Applicant’s...
  • A trademark registration for the mark PROHEAR for audio headphones and related goods has been cancelled based on a likelihood of confusion with the mark PROTEAR for similar goods.   The trademark cancellation proceeding was filed and decided before the U.S. Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. The case, Hangzhou Zhaohu Technology Co., Ltd. v. Hangzhou Johnson...
  • A recent trademark opposition is a lesson in how to properly establish a likelihood of confusion for apparel goods. In Roots Corporation v. Colorful Roots LLC, the Opposer, Roots Corporation, relied on several of its trademark registrations of ROOTS and its derivatives.  The “Roots” Marks, for various apparel items and related accessories in Class 25,...

Fedtrade®

U.S. Market Entry Legal Hub for Innovative Companies
{ Highlight Image }

Subscribe

Stay current on the legal and industry developments that impact businesses across the globe by subscribing to receive updates from Rothwell Figg.

Jump to Page

Necessary Cookies

Necessary cookies enable core functionality such as security, network management, and accessibility. You may disable these by changing your browser settings, but this may affect how the website functions.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies help us improve our website by collecting and reporting information on its usage. We access and process information from these cookies at an aggregate level.